The issue of proxy baptisms
in the LDS Temples being performed for victims of the Holocaust has been a sore
point for several years, and has come to international attention once again. This is at least in part because of the
increased scrutiny of the Church in connection with the Presidential campaign
of Mitt Romney. Basically, and
understandably, many people of Jewish descent are offended by the concept of
their ancestors, who died in large measure because of their religious faith and
identity, being ‘converted’ to the LDS Church, without their consent.
The Church has in the past,
and again in the current situation, vowed to discontinue this practice, and is
often seen favorably because of their being ‘sensitive’ to the feelings of
those who have been objecting.
I see this whole matter in a
very different context, and would like to address why I find the statements and
actions of the Church to be hypocritical.
Having spent several decades
as an active, devoted member, I was taught consistently and repeatedly, the
importance of integrity, and making decisions according to one’s principles, even
when it was not easy, convenient, or comfortable to do so:
On
Sundays, the congregation often joined together singing:
“Do what is right, let the consequence follow...
“Do what is right; be faithful and fearless”
“Choose the right! There is peace in righteous doing.
Choose the right! There's safety for the soul.
Choose the right in all labors you're pursuing;
Let God and heaven be your goal.”
Choose the right! There's safety for the soul.
Choose the right in all labors you're pursuing;
Let God and heaven be your goal.”
Children,
and often adults, wear the official “CTR” ring - Choose The Right - as a
constant reminder to make the right choices.
We
were often instructed to follow the example and counsel given in the Book of
Mormon (1 Nephi 3:7):
And it came to pass that I, Nephi, said unto my
father: I will go and do the things which the Lord hath commanded, for I know
that the Lord giveth no commandments unto the children of men, save he shall
prepare a way for them that they may accomplish the thing which he commandeth
them.
This is actually a
significant part of what attracted me to the Church in the first place: the
insistence on personal integrity, and I earnestly strived to teach this
principle to my children.
Next, consider how the
Church expresses its purpose in the world, in the form of the “Threefold
Mission of the Church”:
- Proclaim the Gospel
- Perfect the Saints
- Redeem the Dead
This is the sacred trust
that the LDS Church states is its reason for existence, the command it has
received from its God. Just to clarify,
“Redeem the Dead” refers to the practice of performing all Temple Ordinances,
including Baptism, on behalf of all those who have gone before, who did not
have the opportunity of hearing and receiving the Gospel while they lived on
earth.
Interestingly, this is
another teaching that first attracted me to the Church: if one accepts at face
value the teaching of Jesus Christ in the New Testament that all have to be
baptized to enter into His Kingdom, this practice provides a way to avoid
anyone being deprived of this opportunity because of where and when they
happened to be born. This was much more
just than, and a far cry from, so many other Christian denominations who
basically wrote these people off, consigning them to a Hell of some sort,
simply because they had never been baptized.
And yet when the Church is
challenged on its principles, it does not follow the counsel it has given to
its members, it doesn’t “go and do the
things which the Lord hath commanded.”
It simply bows to public pressure and abandons its principles.
In this incident, as in so
many other matters, it is clearly demonstrated that the Church functions more
as a Corporation, than a Church. It is
more concerned about its Public Relations, than remaining true to its
principles. Ironically, as one of Jewish
descent myself, I would actually have more respect for the Church if it were
more courageous in its devotion to its conception of truth, however much I
might disagree with it.
I expected the Church to
behave the same as it taught me to behave.
I expected it to “Choose The Right.”
How naive I was...
And now the church has banned the whistle-blower from the church records forevermore. The explanation they gave is like blowing smoke up the nether parts of one's anatomy.
ReplyDeleteThanks for the comment - could you provide some details on the "whistle-blower" reference? I'm not sure what this is about.
DeleteThanks!